Opinion
Approbation And Reprobation Hamper Advocacy Against Witch Persecution In Africa
Published
2 years agoon

By
Leo Igwe
Members of the elite in Nigeria must stop approbating and reprobating the reality of witchcraft. Educated Nigerians continue to blow hot and cold on the existence of witches and wizards. This conflicting and contradictory stance is hurting efforts to stamp out the menace of witch-hunting. This double standard by the elite is undermining and frustrating initiatives to eradicate this dark and dangerous phenomenon. Rather than being an asset, educated people have largely become a liability. Members of the elite are reluctant to take a definite stand against witchcraft accusations and witch persecution. And this is sad, frustrating, and disappointing. This acute unwillingness, rooted in a lack of conviction that witchcraft is an irrational baseless imaginary, is hampering attempts to carry out a robust and effective public enlightenment campaign.
Like most Nigerians, I was born into a witch-believing community. And while growing up, I saw firsthand the vicious and ravaging influence of this misguided belief. I witnessed how imputations of witchcraft and harmful magic poison family relationships, turn relatives and neighbors into enemies. I saw how witchcraft suspicions were employed and deployed to persecute innocent persons and justify horrific abuses, including trial by ordeal, attacks, banishment, abandonment and murder. I have yet to see any shred of evidence for witchcraft or any justification for the egregious harm that is meted out to alleged witches. Still the abuses have persisted, despite the growth in literacy and education. The abuses have continued, even though laws and mechanisms that could be used to combat the pernicious influence of irrational beliefs and practices exist. The witchcraft mentality is entrenched among the elite.
READ ALSO: Imperative Of Civic Engagement On Witchcraft-based Violence In Malawi
Education has failed to dispel occult fears and anxieties that breed these allegations. Literacy has been unable to liberate Nigerians from the grip of this ancient superstition. Educated Nigerians are the most difficult to deal with because they claim to know and to be enlightened. They try to impress on anyone how widely read, educated and traveled they are. The elite try not to miss out on any witchcraft debate. Many try to be relevant; they try to contribute to any conversation on the occult. In fact witchcraft is a topic that every Nigerian, nay African person readily claims expertise even without undergoing any training. Apparently, the elite takes both sides, and no side on the issue. In all, they refuse to adopt a firm stance against this social disease. On one hand, educated Nigerians dismiss witchcraft beliefs as superstitions but on the other hand, they accept it as a reality. In one breath, they claim that witchcraft is mere fantasy or fiction, and in another breath, they state that it is a fact.
On a closer look, this approbating and reprobating on the issue of witchcraft is opportunistic. It is a demonstration of deep and unyielding belief in this occult phenomenon. Let me illustrate the point with a few examples.
Some years ago, a Catholic priest testified before a commission of inquiry that Akwa Ibom State convened to investigate claims of child witchcraft-related abuses. During his testimony, the commissioners asked the priest if he believed in witches. He replied: “As an individual, no; as a church, yes”. The commissioners were confused, and could not question him further. It is not only priests and pastors that entertain this ambiguous position. Non-clerics do. Some time ago I attended a workshop in Akwa Ibom on the same topic: child witchcraft. The UNICEF office in Nigeria organized the programme. A high court judge moderated one of the sessions. In the course of summarizing the discussions, he said: “I do not believe that children could be witches, but I know there are witches and wizards”. I quickly raised my hand and shouted from the audience: “Objection my Lord”. He quickly responded: “You are free to object”. He did not notice the contradiction in his position. Even if he did, the conflicting positions did not matter to him. But they should!
Members of the judiciary have been notorious for equivocating on the issue of witchcraft; they simultaneously reject and accept the reality of witchcraft. Recently we have witnessed instances where some Nigerian magistrates presided over trial by ordeal, convicted or remanded alleged witches in prison. In a related development, during my testimony before the said commission of inquiry in Akwa Ibom, two lawyers, Ukut and Ukam, sent by a witch-hunting pastor in Calabar, cross-examined me. I was shocked at their inability to make a distinction between the Bible and the constitution. They were alluding to verses in the Christian scripture as if they were provisions under the Nigerian law or sections of the criminal code. They mistook being learned in matters of law to being learned in witchcraft issues.
Ambiguous positions on witchcraft matters have persisted among lawyers and other members of the Nigerian elite. Recently, the Advocacy for Alleged Witches issued a press statement asking that disciplinary measures be taken against witch-hunting judges and magistrates in Adamawa State. The statement urged Nigerians to abandon witchcraft accusations because witch-hunting ended in Europe centuries ago. Look I issued that statement. And I knew that Nigeria was not Europe. But look at the comment that a lawyer and human rights officer in one of the states sent me: “Let me first congratulate your people for calling the magistrates and judges out. But, it clearly shows the lacuna between our laws and our beliefs. Nigerians believe in witches and the harm that they do. Unfortunately, no laws are protecting the people against such harm or controlling the practice of witchcraft. The fact remains that Nigeria is not Europe”. She attached a link to a report on a young lady who died after her graduation from the university. According to the report she died as a result of some undisclosed skin ailment. This lawyer then wrote: “They said it is witchcraft. How do you protect your people from such beliefs and practices”.
READ ALSO: AfAW Wants Sanctions For Abdulrazaq Adamu, Other Witch-Hunting Judges, Magistrates
Meanwhile, there was no mention of witchcraft in the report. In reply, I said: “Who are these ‘they’ that said it was witchcraft? What competence do they have? Now, the report says that she died as a result of undisclosed skin disease, right? Look, this is evident from that picture. The skin problem could also be a sign of an underlying ailment. So is skin disease now a form of witchcraft? That is the issue. There is a need to educate our people and ‘protect’ them from the ravaging influence of ignorance and misconceptions about the causes of diseases, not witchcraft beliefs and practices. With sound education based on critical thinking, what you are calling witchcraft beliefs and practices would weaken and disappear; they will loosen their fierce grip on the minds of Nigerians”. She never responded to this. I am afraid that on this issue many lawyers including our magistrates do not understand their job. They need to make a distinction between real and imaginary offences. Witchcraft is an imaginary offence. Lawyers need to provide a categorical answer to this question: Is the duty of a lawyer to handle cases in line with the constitution or in accordance with his or her religious faith?
Meanwhile, there were reactions to the press statement on other platforms that I belong. These platforms have many educated Nigerians who are living at home and abroad. One of them left this comment:
“I have worked in the rural areas as a priest. No matter what you think you know, the people have their explanations of the reality of their lives. Sometimes it coincides with the findings of science, other times, it doesn’t. It doesn’t have to, because science is only one mode of knowing. To tell you, till today, some sicknesses don’t manifest their causes via labs or science-based investigations, yet through rural investigations, the answer and sometimes the healing is achieved.
“The they that say things represent the anonymous majority that transmit information and culture and socialization from one generation to the next”. Look one cannot uphold a belief because it has been handed down from the past. Far from it. There are many mistaken and erroneous beliefs that were handed down from the past. The person who commented was a priest. And priests and pastors have a vested interest in the so-called reality of witchcraft. If there were no witches, priests would invent one. So I was not surprised by his comment.
But other commentators were not priests but still ‘reasoned’ along the same convoluted lines. One of them said:
“Are there witches? Are there people with special powers? That needs to be addressed. The philosophy department of Unilag will tell you that there are people with powers and that it is proven. They will tell you that there is a spiritual phenomenon that has been studied. Should the so-called witches be harmed without any proof? The answer is No. That is where we need to educate everyone. Even if there are proofs concerning what they have done, there should be no extra-judicial acts perpetrated”.
Someone said in another post: “Are there extraordinary abilities or powers? The answer is yes. I have a friend that within his aura, clairvoyant sees him walking with an invisible lion. He is said to possess extraordinary powers. I do not see these things but l have no reason to doubt them. The point is that there are many things we don’t know. What people call witches may exist but not exactly as people understand them”.
Another commentator later stated: “I will also add that being a witch does not translate to a death warrant or jungle justice. You have to be able to prove the alleged witch has broken the law. Even though in reality earthly laws are inadequate in the realm of the supernatural”.
READ ALSO: Witch Persecution And Public Enlightenment In Southeast Nigeria
As these posts have amply illustrated, members of the Nigerian elite – expected to lead the campaign against witch persecution and related abuses- are undecided whether witchcraft is a fact or fiction, science or superstition, real or imaginary crime. And their indecision is hurting the advocacy initiatives. Educated Nigerians continue to equivocate, and ambiguate on witchcraft matters. They should bear in mind that Latin adage that says: quod approbo non reprobo, which means “That which I approve, I cannot disapprove”. Until the Nigerian elite stops approbating and reprobating the reality of witchcraft and the existence of witches, the goal of ending witch persecution and related abuses in the country, and by extension, the continent will not be realized.
Dr. Igwe directs Advocacy for Alleged Witches
Read more authentic news on our social media platforms
You may like
-
Thousands Dump Amosun, Re-Align With Abiodun
-
BREAKING: Govt Increases Salaries Of University Lecturers, Others
-
Coups In Africa: Historical Antecedents, Root Causes, And The Systemic Way Out
-
Reading Professor Olu Obafemi’s Melodies Of Inclement Climes
-
Canada’s Dallaire Institute Invites Nigerian Security Personnel For Elite Child Protection Training
-
Security Operatives Crack Down On Sagamu Cultists, House of Assembly Member, Six Others In DSS Net
Opinion
Reading Professor Olu Obafemi’s Melodies Of Inclement Climes
Published
1 day agoon
September 22, 2023
By Tony Afejuku
“Happiness is a crime in Nigeria.” This is a line – a line of distinction – I am lifting from a message sent to me as a response to my last Friday’s column on ‘“Professor Mabel Evwierhoma on Rubiales and “Wetin women want.”’ The owner of the lifted line is a positively dangerous poet, radical scholar and critic Professor Owojecho Omoha of the University of Abuja. I will at a later date revisit the full message of this literary scholar who is one of the distinguished boosters of this column.
Why is his quoted line meaningful or relevant to me today? For good reason, I have been trying to reinvigorate the idea or thought of happiness in Nigeria – your country my country our country – despite our common concerns concerning our dissatisfaction with our ungrateful leaders who significantly are our demonic consumers consuming this land, our land centuries and more than centuries ago. On my way to Warri last Friday I was thinking deeply about this when I was caught in the Benin-Ologbo obstacle on that cruel stretch of the Benin-Sapele-Warri Road of urbanized or almost urbanized jungle. I was clutching Professor Olu Obafemi’s very new book of poems, his fresh new volume of poetry which he quite properly entitles Melodies of Inclement Climes. I was looking at the moving poems in my desire to erase temporarily from my mind the vicious, tedious, muddy, degraded watery road which is evidently and steadily now the road of the unhappy people of the Niger Delta, and it was at this moment that Owojecho Omoha’s line found me. But I was already engrossed in the first offering, the first poem, in which the Niger Delta malaise stares at me – even though Professor Olu Obafemi is not from the Niger Delta, your Niger Delta my Niger Delta our Niger Delta. Ologbo where conservatively above three thousand trucks (trailers) and other uncountable vehicles – commercial and private – were practically at a stand-still, moving without moving because of the motorable-less motor-way, is one of the unfortunate or tragic by-products of urbanization that is no urbanization in the Niger Delta. Ologbo is a border town, a border community that links Edo State and Delta State. It is the most significant place that links Itsekiri, Urhobo and Edo (Benin) communities. It is the place where the work of cooperation and mutual help among the communities and travellers through the communities can find significantly honest expression that should capture our cultural and patriotic ethos that should give us good health and happiness. This is what Olu Obafemi seems to tell us, among other things, in “Those who gaze beyond today:”
While others like us
Bleed our land to death
Greedily erecting mansions
In other people’s lands,
Laundering filthy coins
Stolen from the sweaty brows
Of the poor and the deprived
In our own un-honed beaches and sandy shores!
Lay to ruin and waste and wreck
The black Gold!
As I read Professor Olu Obafemi’s Melodies at the shores of Ologbo two things emerged to me and rose to my dense imagination in a more than realistic way and manner. The first is that Olu Obafemi is a patriot and a national poet. His imagination extends beyond his Kiri-land (North Eastern Yoruba-land in Northern Nigeria) streams to dwell on national problems that depict our respective inclement climes – or, to put it differently, in his “Streams of Kiriland” (I am not alluding specifically to his poem that bears this title) we have a glimpse of our respective communal malaise that shows us our respective inclement land in our untamed beaches in Ologbo of the Niger Delta and elsewhere outside Ologbo or Kiriland. As beautiful and as nostalgic Kiriland is or may be it is strange that urbanization and civilization have not befriended it. It is this perspective that throws up to me the second vital aspect of Melodies of Inclement Climes. Olu Obafemi conservers what is best from his (and our) past in order for the merciless problems and inclementness of today can be properly addressed. So I am not reading Professor Olu Obafemi as an entire nostalgic poet after all! Our lives’ test is not and cannot be the past or the future. It is now. It is today. It is the present. It is the here and now. Are we happy today in our country – economically, commercially, politically, educationally, medically, technologically, hygiene-wise and otherwise? Without endorsing the present that is before us we cannot honestly face tomorrow. We live in an economy and in a political clime ruled and propelled by ingratitude, disaffection and dissatisfaction and exploitation and oppression. Let me quote our poet of melodies dwelling on our inglorious climes: “Let our earth be replenished again/As scavengers and scoundrels are rid of our land.” (39).This must be so if we must eliminate “Death [that] clings to our throats/As mortal Anopheles, King of Death –/Husband of malaria, swarm/And corpses hold parades on our shores” (44). What our country needs now is a renewed vision, a full insight into our shortcomings, limits and possibilities informed by our awareness and knowledge of our place in the comity of nations. This is an absolute necessity if we must live an adequately and properly human life.
Professor Olu Obafemi is a super ambidextrous writer and scholar of more than numerous parts. He is best known as a play-wright, dramatist and theatre personage, theorist and critic of a profoundly profound mind. But he is without question a poet of distinction as well – which the present volume superbly makes evident. Melodies of Inclement Climes appeals to me exceedingly from the perspectives of the rhetoric of poetic drama, phenomenology, biography, memory, wrap of childhood, autobiography, history, activism, politics, geography, social exploration, revolutionary revolution, psychology, public health, progressive variation in language and feeling. I am on purpose not dwelling on all these perspectives in this briefly appealing enterprise to engender every reader’s interest in Melodies. (I am thinking of something adventurous and enchantingly enchanting outside here). With respect to the last named subject, let me titillate my readers thus: I wish you to join me to think of Professor Olu Obafemi as a magnificent poet who concentrates everything feelingly into a sentence –“Melodies of Inclement Climes;” “And hardened villains of misrule;” “And love shall visit these shores again;” “This is the story of our nation now; Debtor-elephant.”
The beauty of Professor Olu Obafemi’s new volume of poetry is the trick of its language. The emotions or feelings the poet generates are significant enough to ensure full daylight in our inclement climes. It is thus not for nothing that Professor Olu Obafemi has been a recipient of the Nigerian National Order of Merit (NNOM) and wearer of other laurels. His rhetoric is not any adornment or inflation of words done for the reader’s unquestionable insight or for a particular effect but for a general creative power that has an intensity and concision of indubitably great poetry.
Melodies of Inclement Climes will leap in my arms, hands, and mind for a pretty long time of creative reading and critical happiness. This is not an ostentatious praise, but the true judgment of a reader and critic – this reader and critic – of esthetic and moral sensibility. I duly bow and salute the poet for this fresh volume. Join me in my bow and salutation.
Afejuku can be reached via 08055213059.

By Toyin Falola
Western deception has been with Africa forever:
1493: Pope Alexander VI issued a papal bull, “Inter Caetera,” proclaiming the right of Spain and Portugal to enslave Africans and own the land. They were subjects. They stole your people and your land.
1885: Africa was a Dark Continent. It required colonization to become civilized. Europe would bring change and civilize them. They stole your raw materials and truncated your self-development.
1940: When over a million Africans fought in Europe, North Africa and the Far East during the Second World War, the West convinced them they were dying for freedom and democracy. But where in Africa do they receive freedom and democracy? Indeed, Apartheid was inaugurated in 1948 in South Africa.
When will this deception come to an end? So, Gabon and Niger were democracies before the 2023 coups? You must be using the wrong dictionary to define democracy. Cameroon under the invalid Paul Biya is a democracy? You must be confusing the Mali Empire with the modern country of Cameroon. And the presidents who rule for as long as they want practising democracy?
You need a little education.
Recent developments in Africa’s political space, particularly the growing number of military takeovers, have informed fresh queries around the expressions of neo-colonialism in Africa and the commitment to liberal democracy as the ideal political model for the region. The point of reference for these queries is the ceremonial reactions from the acclaimed “champions of democracy” in the West, who waste no time issuing condemnations at every instance of “democratic failure” on the continent without any actual commitment to ensuring that power indeed lies with the people. Not only have these champions of African interests—the United States (US), Britain and France—touted democracy as the best system of political organization to achieve political stability and economic prosperity in Africa, but they have also prosecuted wars, allegedly in its defence, which cost millions of lives and destabilized entire regions. However, it is not enough to accuse our benevolent friends in the West of hypocrisy without providing compelling proof of double-dealing in delivering their duties as democratic crusaders. After all, in a democratic setting, all are innocent until proven guilty.
As a philosophy of government, democracy has existed since the Greco-Roman times. However, its foray into Africa can be traced to the eve of independence when Britain and France introduced forms of local representation as concessions to indigenous demands for independence. Thus, from 1959, parliamentary elections and other democratic institutions started to become commonplace on the continent. But, as it would turn out, this democratic experiment, which formed part of the third (global) wave of democracy, was to be short-lived—derailed as it was by fluctuating Western interests on the continent.
Guiding Western interest in Africa from the 1950s was the ideological war between the West (mainly the USA) and the Soviet Union. The “Cold War,” as it came to be known, was the first incident to unmask the real intentions of the West for post-colonial Africa. In their quest to emerge as the world’s sole superpower, the US and the Soviet Union, who actively strove to undermine each other’s influence by, among other things, advancing their political ideologies around the world, turned to Africa as another important frontier of conquest. While the Soviet Union armed African revolutionary movements against their Western colonial overlords and provided support to openly communist governments, Washington concluded that, to effectively check the spread of Soviet influence on the continent, it was more expedient to enthrone biddable leaders in African states than it was to woo them with any ideological arguments or economic incentives.
Anxious to ensure power was handed over to reliable politicians, Britain and France became eager participants in the US policy in Africa. Together, the US and its allies targeted venal local strongmen, preferably with military backgrounds and authoritarian tendencies, who, in collaboration with its intelligence agencies, ousted legitimate/democratic governments. Notable victims and beneficiaries of this plot included (in the former category) Kwame Nkrumah of Ghana, Patrice Lumumba of Congo DRC, Sylvio Olympio of Togo and (in the latter category) Idi Amin of Uganda, Mobutu Sese Seko of Congo DRC and Gnassingbé Eyadema of Togo, to mention a few. Consequently, thirty-three African countries that achieved independence between 1956-1970 became authoritarian immediately or not long after.
Another demonstration of the complete disregard that the West has for democracy, peace/stability and human rights in Africa is its willingness to engulf the entire region in conflict so that it can achieve its “strategic interests.” Once again, we begin from the Cold War era where, having recently come out of a highly destructive war in Europe (in 1945) and being cautious of engaging in another, the West and the Eastern Bloc turned Africa into the site of their proxy wars. In southern Africa, where the US considered both Angola and Mozambique as areas of “strategic interests,” Washington armed the 200,000 Portuguese conscripts, who went on to fight a protracted war against local nationalist revolutionaries, with imported weapons, which included defoliants and napalm. In Angola, the US, in cooperation with Apartheid South Africa, backed the National Union for Total Independence (UNITA) against the country’s (Soviet-backed) leading national liberation front, the Popular Movement for the Liberation of Angola (MPLA). There were also similar cases in northern Africa where Sudan was funded and armed by the US against Egypt and Ethiopia, who had also pitched their tents with Moscow. These conflicts and the resultant proliferation of arms saw the loss of millions of African lives from war and famine and a general destabilization of the region.
While the West cannot be said to have been directly involved in all the occasions of transition from democratic to authoritarian rule, in more than a few instances, the leaders of newly independent democratic/multi-party African states seized the opportunity of Western patronage to quickly switch to one-party/despotic rule. In other cases, it was the corruption, resource mismanagement, “tribalism,” patrimonialism, clientelism and imperialism perpetrated by a Western-backed ruling political class which formed the basis of military takeovers (coups). Nevertheless, in this atmosphere of quasi-democratic rule, full-fledged despotism, military rule and Apartheid—where national resources were siphoned by kleptocratic regimes and millions of Africans either became refugees or died as a result of civil wars, hunger, and human rights abuses—our western “friends” were content to look the other way if the government in place proved itself an ally of Washington.
Perhaps the most glaring example of the West’s democratic hypocrisy in Africa was its age-long support for the highly racist and politically repressive Apartheid regime in South Africa. Like the French, who were able to cajole Washington into believing that they were fighting communist-backed insurgents in Algeria, the South African Apartheid regime, for forty years, posed as the last bastion against communists in Africa—an attitude that was able to secure a steady flow of western arms. This, alongside the West’s tacit approval, allowed for one of Africa’s most despicable shows of human debasement, carried out in the name of imperialism and racial superiority. After all, as President Ronald Regan remarked in 1981, South Africa was “essential to the free world in its production of minerals we all must have.”
The end of the Cold War changed Western attitudes towards Africa. Without the Soviet threat, the West leaned more towards development diplomacy and foreign aid regimes as the main thrust of its foreign policy in Africa. Foreign aid to Africa, however, turned out to be a Trojan horse. Already saddled with the task of building vibrant economies whilst also harmonizing the aspirations of the different ethnic nationalities which characterized them, African countries, especially in Francophone Africa, also had to grapple with the undermining economic and political agreements they had been coerced into signing with their erstwhile colonial overlord as a condition for independence and continued patronage. To make matters worse, some African countries were, at the end of the Cold War, either fighting or had just come out of civil war. This, combined with the widespread corruption and mismanagement of national resources which characterized Africa’s tyrannical governments, put many Af5rican countries at the mercy of international monetary agencies (the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank) and their financiers whose aid they were now heavily dependent on.
At first, these Bretton Woods institutions were content to grant loans/aid, at debilitating interest rates no less, to authoritarian leaders who used them to perpetuate themselves in power and, in return, provided the former with mineral and other economic concessions. However, without the Cold War pressures, more emphasis was placed on the liberalization and capitalist/free-market aspects of US foreign policy to guarantee return on investments. Soon enough, Structural Adjustments Programmes (SAPs) were introduced as a precondition for further loans/aid. Said adjustments, which demanded limited government intervention in the public sector, i.e., removing government subsidies in energy (fuel/gas), education and health care, brought untold hardships to already suffering populations. And as research has shown, poverty and non-tax revenue make for the ideal democratic environment. In other words, “when the government is not beholden to citizens for its funding, there is less accountability and less reason to democratize” (Tilly 1990). Instead, leaders simply use the “free” funding from natural resources (oil) and foreign loans/aid to buy enough support to remain in power.
Judging from the various expressions of Western interests in Africa over decades, it goes without saying that the West simply pays lip service to ideologies when convenient. Although many Africans might not object to the cynical pragmatism that has always guided Western foreign policy in Africa, I dare say they will not stand for the continued lies and hypocrisy that have characterized Western reactions to African developments. Even if the above-described instances of Western hypocrisy in Africa were to be argued to be in the past, it is a living past for Africa.
Africa, today, still has authoritarian governments in place whose political repression and human rights abuses go on unchecked by our democracy and rule of law-loving friends in the West. After being siphoned by kleptocratic governments, our commonwealth still finds its way to Western banks, where it sits and improves the local economy. Western interests continue to impoverish Africans and destabilize their regions. So, Africans are today saying to the West, its diplomats, presidents, and the other agents of its propaganda: “Your gambit in Africa is up. Our people are awakened!”
The West has sold you a fake product called democracy. Africans, your vote is not a sign of democracy. It is no more than a deception. There is no democracy without accountability. You are just voting thieves to power. There is no democracy without transparency. You are just using your votes in support of crooks and thugs. There is no democracy without good governance. Your vote is facilitating theft. Maybe you are waiting for your turn to steal. There is no democracy without development. Your vote is moving you back to the Stone Age. Even early humans knew when to replace stones with iron during the Stone Age. Africa, you don’t have a democracy. Anyone you have not appointed cannot disappoint you! Citizens are being deceived, and they are deceiving themselves. Organize yourselves at various levels and think of alternatives to democracy or, at the minimum, how accountability and transparency will form the core of your democratic practices. Your lifetime president is not a Democrat. He is an authoritarian kleptocrat far worse than the combination of Doris Payne, Stephane Breitwieser, Simon Leviev, Veerappan, Derek Smalls, Vincenzo Peruggia, Bonnie and Clyde, Natwarlal, Carl Gugasian, Frank Abagnale, Anna Sorokin, Albert Spaggiari, Jesse James, Anthony Strangis, and Bill Mason. Do you know these names?
Opinion
Informaction: Theory Of Change And Witch Persecution In Africa
Published
4 days agoon
September 19, 2023
By Leo Igwe
A theory of change explains how activities, measures, and steps undertaken to address a problem could facilitate or help realize certain changes or outcomes. It articulates how an impact would be achieved and some progress made. In this case, the expected outcome is an end to witch-hunting in Africa. Unlike in Western countries, the persecution of supposed witches persists in the region. Witch bloodletting takes place in many parts of Africa. The persecution of people accused of witchcraft leads to horrific abuses and death. Alleged witches are attacked, tortured, lynched, imprisoned, or banished. They are subjected to jungle justice, trial by ordeal, forced disappearance, and internal displacement. Simply put, those who are accused of perpetrating occult harm are treated without mercy or compassion. Incidentally, the impression is that nothing could be done to combat or neutralize this dark and destructive phenomenon, that witch hunting is cultural to Africans. The impression is that seeking to eradicate witch-hunting in African societies is a futile effort. This notion is gravely mistaken and needs to be corrected. The Advocacy for Alleged Witches was launched in 2020 to correct these misconceptions and facilitate effective actions. It works to fill the missing link in the activism against witch persecution in the region. The AfAW is a protest initiative, and exists to challenge and dispel allegations of witchcraft.
The main goal is to end witch-hunting in Africa by 2030. This objective sounds like an ambitious goal or some pipe dream, but it can be achieved. And AfAW aims to end witch hunting based on an informactional theory of change. This theory rests on two pillars: information and action because witch hunting persists in the region due to lack of information, or misinformation, and due to lack of action, inaction, or infraction. The Advocacy for Alleged Witches uses this two-pronged approach to combat witch-hunting in Africa.
At the global level, there is a lack of information about witch-hunting in Africa. Although a lot has been written and published on witchcraft in African societies, many people in Europe and America claim do not know about raging witch hunts in the region. Part of the problem is that these publications are filled with misinformation and misinterpretation of witchcraft accusations and witch persecution in the region. Scholars have presented witchcraft accusations as benign and useful to African societies. Meanwhile these accusations are not in any way gentle or pleasant. Studies have portrayed witchcraft allegations as stabilizing and harmonizing mechanisms. They have overlooked the critical and skeptical perspective of witchcraft beliefs. Scholars have largely ignored the accused side of the story, the harmful and destructive consequences of witchcraft imputations. At the Advocacy for Alleged Witches, we work to correct the misrepresentation of witchcraft accusations in Africa. We campaign to draw attention to this imbalance in the perception of the phenomenon. But correct information is not enough. Balanced interpretation does not suffice. To combat witch persecution, information needs to be turned into action, into effective policies and interventions.
On the action side, the Advocacy for Alleged Witches takes measures to address the problem because lack of adequate information has occasioned inaction or infractions. Wrong information has resulted in apathy and indifference towards witch hunting in Africa. Many international agencies are reluctant to act; they have refused to take action or to treat the issue with the urgency it deserves. With adequate and balanced information, international organizations would take appropriate actions.
At the local level, the Advocacy for Alleged Witches works to fill the information and action gaps. Many people accuse and engage in witch hunts due to a lack of information or misinformation. Accusers act based on a lack of information about the cause of illnesses, deaths, and other misfortune. Many people persecute witches because they have incorrect information about who or what is responsible for their problems, because they are not informed about what to do and where to go, who or what to blame for their misfortunes. Many people do not know what constitutes sufficient reason and causal explanations for their problems. As part of the efforts to end witch-hunting, the AfAW highlights misinformation and disinformation about causes of misfortune, illness, death, accidents, poverty, and infertility, including the misinformation that charlatans and con artists, god men and women such as traditional priests, pastors, mallam and marabouts use to exploit poor ignorant folks. The AfAW provides evidence-based knowledge, explanation, and interpretation of misfortunes. It informs the public about the law and other existing mechanisms to address allegations of witchcraft. The AfAW sensitizes the public and public institutions, including schools, colleges, and universities. It sponsors media programs, issues press releases, makes social media posts, and publishes articles and blogs on witch-hunting in the region.
NEW TIMES CULTURE

Thousands Dump Amosun, Re-Align With Abiodun

BREAKING: Govt Increases Salaries Of University Lecturers, Others

Coups In Africa: Historical Antecedents, Root Causes, And The Systemic Way Out
Top Stories
-
Opinion3 days ago
The West And The Hypocrisy Of Democracy
-
Latest News4 days ago
Police Refund N810,000 Extorted From Victim To Delta CDHR
-
Opinion4 days ago
Aguoru
-
Interview14 hours ago
Coups In Africa: Historical Antecedents, Root Causes, And The Systemic Way Out
-
Opinion4 days ago
A – Z Of Ibadan Achievements